In a dramatic turn in the ongoing congressional probe into the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, James Comer, Chair of the House Oversight Committee, confirmed that Ghislaine Maxwell invoked her Fifth Amendment rights during a virtual deposition Tuesday morning. The long-awaited testimony ended without substantive answers, intensifying national scrutiny of the committee’s investigation into alleged sex trafficking networks linked to Epstein.
According to Comer, Maxwell declined to answer all questions, citing constitutional protections against self-incrimination. The session began shortly before 10:30 a.m. ET and concluded without new disclosures.
What Happened During Maxwell’s Deposition?
Maxwell’s refusal to testify marks a pivotal moment in the House Oversight Committee’s investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s financial dealings and alleged trafficking operations.
In an official statement, Robert Garcia, the committee’s ranking Democratic member, sharply criticized Maxwell’s silence:
“After months of defying our subpoena, Ghislaine Maxwell finally appeared before the Oversight Committee and said nothing. She answered no questions and provided no information about the men who raped and trafficked women and girls.”
The Fifth Amendment allows individuals to decline answering questions that may incriminate them. Legal experts note that invoking this constitutional protection is common in high-profile investigations, particularly when criminal exposure remains possible.
Still, the lack of cooperation adds tension to an already politically charged inquiry.
The Broader Epstein Investigation: What’s at Stake?
The House Oversight Committee is examining financial relationships, travel records, and potential institutional failures connected to Jeffrey Epstein and his associates.
While Maxwell has already been convicted in federal court for sex trafficking-related crimes, lawmakers are now focused on understanding:
The financial infrastructure behind Epstein’s operations
The role of high-profile associates
Whether any government or corporate entities failed to act
The investigation continues to generate bipartisan attention, fueled by public demand for transparency and accountability.
Upcoming Depositions: High-Profile Names on the Schedule
Despite Maxwell’s silence, Chair Comer emphasized that the investigation is far from over. Five additional depositions are scheduled in the coming weeks, including prominent figures connected to Epstein’s financial and social networks.
1. Les Wexner – February 18
Les Wexner, the billionaire founder of L Brands and a former financial client of Epstein, is set to testify. Wexner previously acknowledged granting Epstein extensive financial authority, a relationship that has drawn intense scrutiny.
2. Hillary Clinton – February 26
Hillary Clinton is scheduled for a deposition. Representatives for Clinton have indicated a preference for public testimony rather than a closed-door session.
3. Bill Clinton – February 27
Former President Bill Clinton will also sit for questioning. Flight logs and past associations have prompted congressional interest, though no criminal charges have been filed against him in connection with Epstein.
4. Epstein’s Accountant – March 11
The committee aims to analyze financial records, offshore accounts, and money transfers that may reveal additional details about Epstein’s wealth and operations.
5. Epstein’s Lawyer – March 19
Legal counsel for Epstein could provide insights into settlements, nondisclosure agreements, and internal legal strategies that shielded aspects of his activities.
Political Tensions and Public Transparency
The investigation unfolds amid significant political polarization. Republicans and Democrats have clashed over procedural issues, witness cooperation, and whether hearings should be conducted publicly.
Calls for open testimony reflect broader public interest in transparency. Supporters argue that live hearings would restore public trust, while others caution that sensitive victim-related information must be handled carefully.
The Epstein case remains one of the most controversial criminal and political scandals in recent U.S. history. With global attention and persistent public questions, the House Oversight Committee’s work could shape future legislative reforms related to human trafficking, financial oversight, and institutional accountability.
Why This Matters Now
The refusal of Ghislaine Maxwell to testify underscores the legal complexities surrounding congressional investigations tied to criminal cases. While invoking the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right, it often leaves lawmakers—and the public—without immediate answers.
As high-profile depositions approach, the stakes remain high:
Will new testimony reveal undisclosed financial connections?
Could public hearings shift political narratives?
Will legislative reforms emerge from the findings?
For now, the investigation continues, with lawmakers signaling they intend to pursue every available lead.
Stay Informed
For continued coverage on the House Oversight Committee investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and related congressional depositions, subscribe to our newsletter. We provide in-depth reporting on political accountability, federal investigations, and high-profile congressional hearings—delivered directly to your inbox.
As the next wave of testimony unfolds, one thing is certain: the search for answers is far from over.