Meta Platforms Inc. and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg are at the center of a blockbuster legal battle that could reshape how corporate boards are held accountable for data misuse. The $8 billion trial, now underway in Delaware’s Chancery Court, stems from Meta’s (formerly Facebook’s) alleged failure to protect user data in violation of a 2012 agreement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
🔍 The Origin: Cambridge Analytica Scandal (2018)
The case was launched in the aftermath of revelations that data from tens of millions of Facebook users had been improperly accessed by Cambridge Analytica — a now-defunct political consulting firm linked to Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign. The incident led to a historic $5 billion FTC fine in 2019, which shareholders now want Zuckerberg and other leaders to personally cover.
⚖️ The Stakes
Shareholders accuse Meta’s top brass — including Zuckerberg, former COO Sheryl Sandberg, board members Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel, and others — of breaching fiduciary duties by knowingly allowing privacy violations. The lawsuit seeks reimbursement for regulatory fines and legal fees totaling more than $8 billion.
If successful, it would mark one of the most significant Caremark claims in Delaware corporate law history — a rare and difficult type of case that alleges board members failed in their duty to oversee company compliance.
🧑⚖️ Who’s on the Stand?
Neil Richards, privacy law expert from Washington University, opened the trial by asserting Facebook misled the public about its data policies.
Jeffrey Zients, Biden’s former Chief of Staff and Meta board member (2018–2020), is also expected to testify.
Billionaire board figures such as Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, and Netflix co-founder Reed Hastings will take the stand.
Former COO Sheryl Sandberg and CEO Mark Zuckerberg will also be key witnesses.
Zuckerberg is additionally accused of dumping over $1 billion in stock ahead of the Cambridge Analytica fallout — a charge his legal team denies, citing pre-scheduled trading plans that prevent insider manipulation.
🛡️ Defense Strategy
The defendants claim the allegations are "extreme" and that Facebook worked with external consultants to ensure FTC compliance. They argue Facebook was itself deceived by Cambridge Analytica and that no board member deliberately ignored red flags.
🌐 Meta’s Current Position
While Meta itself is not named as a defendant, the company has declined to comment publicly. On its website, Meta says it has invested billions into data privacy infrastructure since 2019.
💼 Legal and Corporate Ramifications
This case could reshape how corporate governance is judged in data-sensitive industries. Although Caremark claims are notoriously hard to win, courts in recent years have increasingly allowed such lawsuits to proceed — especially when board oversight lapses are tied to massive public fallout.
The trial also follows recent changes to Delaware corporate law, which were passed after a private meeting between Meta representatives and the state’s governor. These reforms were designed to make it harder for shareholders to challenge insider deals but did not affect oversight claims like this one.
🚨 Meta Considers Corporate Exodus from Delaware
Adding fuel to the fire, some of the company’s leaders and allies have expressed growing dissatisfaction with Delaware’s legal environment:
Andreessen Horowitz, co-founded by Marc Andreessen, recently reincorporated in Nevada, citing legal instability after Delaware voided Elon Musk’s $56 billion Tesla pay deal.
Reports indicate Meta itself considered relocating from Delaware earlier this year but remains incorporated there for now.
📉 Bigger Than Meta?
If the plaintiffs succeed, this case could set precedent for other tech giants and their boards. It would follow a 2021 Boeing settlement in which directors paid $237.5 million over similar oversight failure claims — the largest of its kind to date.
The Only AI That Knows All Your Work
Most AI tools start from scratch every time. ClickUp Brain already knows the answers.
It has full context of all your work—docs, tasks, chats, files, and more. No uploading. No explaining. No repetitive prompting.
It's not just another AI tool. It's the first AI that actually understands your workflow because it lives where your work happens.
Join 150,000+ teams and save 1 day per week.